fixes the wording to eliminate edge case in 5.D.3.C.b#213
fixes the wording to eliminate edge case in 5.D.3.C.b#213SpencerCreveling merged 1 commit intoComputerScienceHouse:masterfrom SpencerCreveling:fix-5.D.3.C
Conversation
|
On-floor freshman during the first semester are Resident members but not Active members who have not passed a Membership Evaluations |
mxmeinhold
left a comment
mxmeinhold
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How is this an edge case? The present wording is current practice.
|
because of section 5.D.2.A.4.B.a an intro member that passes intro evals is considered an active member, if that active member is off floor and thus a non-Resident member then they are still technically a required signature according to the current wording. |
|
You should amend 5.D.2.A.2 to align with current practice instead. |
|
their is no need as 5.D.2.A.2 perfectly reflects the current way we set up packet. the issue is not who can an cannot signe a packet the issue is who does and doesn't count towards the bare minimum 60% for account creation. which is covered in 5.D.3.C.b |
| If a second Introductory Process is approved, the Evaluations Director may initiate a new Introductory Packet within the first or second week of the Introductory Process. | ||
| \asubsubsubsection{The Introductory Packet} | ||
| Each Introductory Process participant, after the first week, is given two (2) weeks to return a document that should contain a signature from all Active members, all Introductory Resident members, and ten (10) of any combination of the following: | ||
| Each Introductory Process participant, after the first week, is given two (2) weeks to return a document that should contain a signature from all Active Members who have passed a Membership Evaluation, all Active Resident Members, all Introductory Resident Members, and ten (10) of any combination of the following: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: might be better to say "Resident Active" etc, but otherwise I think you've cleaned up the holes in your previous commit.
mxmeinhold
added
Proposal
Ballot Pending
SpencerCreveling
added
Ballots Issued
|
Amendment #213, fixes the wording to eliminate edge case in 5.D.3.C.b, has passed with the following results! |
3 participants
Check one:
Summary of change(s):
fixes the wording to eliminate edge case that allows active members who have not passes an intro evals to be a required signature